Collective Responsibility and Religion

The following was written in response to this article in the New York Times:

Like many New York citizens, I worry about how religious values are used to advance a political agenda.

However collective blame is  a terrible way to create public policy. Muslims are collectively responsible for the September 11 tragedy to the extent that  Jews are collectively responsible for the death of Jesus and to the extent that  Christians are collectively responsible for the Crusades.

One last thing. At the conclusion of World War I, the Treaty of Versailles assigned collective blame to Germany and its allies for all ‘loss and damage’ suffered by the Allies. The Axis nations were ordered to pay reparations to victorious nations for future years; demands that were widely acknowledged to be excessive. The economic consequences of these payments have been acknowledged as contributing to the fall of the Weimar Republic and the rise of Nazism.

Those ramifications need not be explored further.

  • Share/Bookmark

A letter to Raza re: the Cordoba Mosque

Dear Ms. Raza,

I created this blog as one of many means to remind me of all the amazing things and people in this world, especially when surrounded by the lunacy is typical of daily life. I wanted – make that needed – a place to remember all the incredibly inspirational things that blow me away for a second but then vanish forever. So in short all good, no bad/dull subjects.

But the whole controversy about the construction of the Cordoba Mosque on the eve of Ramadan has irritated me immensely, especially after the nonsense you spouted on Fox News… Video and more after the jump.

» More on A letter to Raza re: the Cordoba Mosque

  • Share/Bookmark

Afghanistan Detainees: the view of Bill Pentney

So I just came out of listening to the Associate Defence Minister of Canada speak. Really fascinating guy who shed a lot of new light on the Canada’s role in Afghanistan. It seems that the system created between the Canadian forces, the ICRC and the Afghan forces is primarily to blame for the abuse scandal. Moreover he expressed a number of concerns with respect to the choice that states have in choosing whether the Geneva Conventions apply to detained soldiers. Lastly he attacked the notion that the government of Canada is an occupying force, pointing out that Canada is present with the consent of the democratically elected Afghan government. This may have been one reason why the Federal Court did not believe the Charter applied to Afghan detainees.

However he also talked about the importance of emerging technologies in the international legal system. In particular he discussed a unique approach adopted by Katey O’Malley in comparing redacted documents. Instead of spending countless hours looking over 1000′s of documents alone, she put out a call to the blogosphere to do the same job for free. The results are astounding.

Will likely get in touch with him to talk about some of the stuff Im interested in. Looking forward to hear what he says about my research on IHL.

  • Share/Bookmark

Canada's Global Presence in 2017

Just catching up on some of the Liberal Policy Conference presentations. The one on internationalism featuring Janice Stein, was particularly riveting (to me at least).

» More on Canada in 2017

  • Share/Bookmark
Page 2 of 212